The Return

[From a novel in progress]

Damian Tarnopolsky

There was snow on the streets. Just a thin layer. Late snow. Her shoes cracked through it sometimes as she ran, but she never lost her grip wearing winter spikes. She went up the hill toward the park, finding her rhythm, finding it hard. She ran past the solitary pet store, inexplicable amidst the houses on this street, some kind of grandfathered zoning regulation, equally inexplicable that it would stay open now, but perhaps that was it, people were feeding their children dog food after all. She should slow down, she thought, in order to be able to keep her pace up on the way back, her average pace was higher than usual, higher than it should be, her average pace appeared in red rather than blue. Because every time you start to run you feel like an Olympic champion; the question is always about the return.

When her music came on, as it always did as her pace slowed, as she climbed the hill because the shell knew she needed the push because she’d needed it before then she swiped it away, and she knew she was causing her shell no end of headaches with the way she was acting these days, but she didn’t care, sometimes she played with the algorithm to confuse it, and she equally swiped away Saul on the couch holding a thimble of Scotch in place between finger and thumb on his hairy belly and lingered only a moment on Flower turning over in bed before doing the same to her and said aloud I want to be able to see my damn feet, one shoe and then the next, as she got to the top of the hill, and there where she made her turn she could see the whole city, as if nothing were wrong, as if everyone were home, safe in bed, as if the majority of the street lights worked rather than the majority being in looted disrepair (and she hated what that meant, though she loved the darkness, she loved being able to show the Milky Way to Flower any evening in their shared backyard; it was like being at her mother’s farm), as if tomorrow would bring no shock greater than a hailstorm, as if this horrible, constant, febrile feeling of wrongness, of everything being wrong and hurried and dirty and wrong had disappeared forever, as late-winter air cracked so coolly through these tubes these filaments the capillaries of her lungs as fine as Flower’s hair as she stood there, waiting to run down the hill again, savouring this heated cold air that lit her up, turned her whole body orange from the inside out as her breath gradually, gradually, gradually slowed. I love you, she said, I hate you. I am happy, I am sad. She started back down toward her city. The last silver and yellow threads of the day let go and fell once and for all and it was dark.

As she returned, she was considering what she would say to Saul, that is, she was hearing her voice say certain things, making certain answers to his inevitable rebuttals and rejections. So much thinking is us making little movies of ourselves, and we do it all the time. Only some of them come up to the surface, most of this work we do without even knowing it. What the shell can do is slant the table, tilt certain thoughts more in the direction of consciousness. It’s all based on our own proclivities anyway, our own values; that’s why they say the shell knows you better than you know yourself. It can make you better than yourself.

In her head naturally she was hearing a song again she’d heard when she was young, a song by the Clash, a song that was old already when she was young, and then she realized that it was because she and Saul were clashing, and she hated her mind for being so obvious. And she was slowing down, she had to shorten her stride as she came down the hill, it was like jutting each leg down as she came down the hill, like an alien craft landing, maybe that would be the next calamity, and then a glaze of thinking about nothing at all, that was the best part of the run, just her body taking step after step to get her home, the last fifty paces as she came up to their side gate, the last laboured and ethereal walk along the side of their building, by that angling fence they had to fix, feeling like the best part of having a mind was feeling it was gone, when she saw it.

Coyotes were abroad in the city; that was nothing new, though they’d become more brazen, now they jogged down the middle of the streets they owned in daylight, and her first thought was Flower, and she saw Flower safe in bed and stopped dead. This was a big one. She leaned forward, hands on her hips, still trying to slow her breathing. It hadn’t run from her, and she wondered why. It was a shape in the dark, but no, too big for a coyote. Madly, she thought bear, no, boar, it was a bear come down from Moose Lake to eat their garbage, it was a wild boar run out of France to stalk her, its breath and grunt confirmed that, the bristles on its nose, wild boar, her shell was searching furiously, it was telling her to wait, Would you like to report a fault?, it asked her, The one time I actually need you, she thought, but it wasn’t a boar. Just give me some light, she said, and her vision improved, and the thing the dog the beast the werewolf took a sleek step sideways and backward. She touched the fence, and with her toe she nudged away a broken pink Frisbee. A sleek, grey wild dog made out of nature, black and silver and grey, strangely dignified though wild, and she knew what it was: a wolf was looking back at her, she was looking at a wolf in the alleyway next to her apartment. They were staring at each other, each one as surprised, each one as calm as the other. Her breath wouldn’t settle—first the run, and now the shock. She thought her heart would burst at the ravening beauty of it, the sheen of snow shining on the lower parts of its flanks. Both of them breathing, now, watching. I am dreaming, she said. You’re here because I dreamed of you.

The shell was saying many things to her, and she ignored them all. At last, the wolf shifted its weight and it gave a little whine as it did. Very slowly, gently, Heath knelt. She reached her right hand out. Often to speak to Flower about something serious she’d be down on her knees on the black wood floor. Her knee touched the wet gravel; nothing hurts more. Little wolf, she said. She moved two fingers forward for it to smell. I have nothing to give you, she said. It watched her for a while. She made her eyes narrow and soft and waited, trying to exude authority without threat.

Only my heart, she said.

Darling, you’ve got to let me know came into her head.

The wolves are invading. And then she thought no, they’re returning. All of this was forest long ago and theirs before anyone came to steal it; this wolf used to lie here on its belly with paws crossed, watching the snow fall. Was its paw caught in a trap like in Jack London, was Saul trapping wild animals in the driveway? And then she saw no, the big stomach bulging sideways and outward, babies. She-wolf, sow-breasted, limp-pawed, like me.

Are you hungry? Is that why you’re here? Is that why you’re not running, she asked, but it sounded stated, not a question. What a world you’ve chosen to bring them into, she said.

No snow now, no moon. She’d felt a sharpness tonight, all night, and it was confirmed now in the wolf’s sliced amber eyes.

I wish I had a chopped steak, she said. Their trashcans were emptied every night by hungry children but maybe there was something. She wanted Flower to come down, but she wanted her not to. Reading her mind, the wolf inched forward, soft-furred, unsteady.

Are you crying? she said.

When she first met Saul’s father, he kissed her hand. He was an old gentleman that way.

I’m sorry, she whispered. We’ve nothing here.

Heath slid her right foot forward, then her left. Then as if it were the little cat in residence in her brain, she put one hand behind its ear and rubbed. The wolf angled her head in that direction, did not demur, so she did the same with the other. She breathed in deeply now, smelling wood fire and wet pine, and fetid warm mud, and something older. The softness of the fur on diamantine bone. A growl and a wheeze, then quiet. Look at us both, said Heath. What are you here to dig up?

She lifted its grey lip back like a vet. She eased a finger into its mouth, then another, and then more of her hand, further, feeling the wet warmth. It watched her and at first it whined, but then it let her, and she withdrew, leaving just her index finger by its tongue.

Feast on me, she whispered. My blood. Bite. Kiss me. Feast. Search with your teeth and find.

A truck groaned down the street perpendicular to them and the lock of their gaze broke. Wolf-jaw snapped away, tearing her skin. Oh no, no, she thought. She felt it keenly, this bond cracked, it was like slicing a lemon and cutting your hand. And without a look back, it, she, was padding away silently and was gone, without a look back, only footprints, as if Heath had never been.

Good luck, said Heath, quietly, not wiping her fingers on her thighs. I’ll never see you again.

Wolves were taking over the city. There were wolves in every garden, in every boardroom. They were dropping spinach nests into pots, she thought, they were getting ahead, they were buying cottages up north, they were landing in airplanes on the Island. They had come down ahead of the glaciers melting. They were here to stake their claim.

Heath knew what to do then, as in a dream there is no doubt.

DAMIAN TARNOPOLSKY

Damian Tarnopolsky’s most recent book is Every Night I Dream I’m a Monk, Every Night I Dream I’m a Monster. His work has been nominated for many awards, including the Commonwealth Writers’ Prize, the Amazon Canada First Novel Award, and the Journey Prize, and he won the Voaden Prize for Playwriting in 2019. He teaches at the Narrative-Based Medicine Lab at the University of Toronto.

ON PHONE NOTES, GRIEF, AND DOUBLE MFAs

A conversation with Cassidy McFadzean

CASSIDY MCFADZEAN

is the author of three books of poetry: Crying Dress (House of Anansi, 2024); Drolleries (McClelland & Stewart, 2019), shortlisted for the Raymond Souster Award; and Hacker Packer (McClelland & Stewart, 2015), winner of two Saskatchewan Book Awards and finalist for the Gerald Lampert Award. Her fiction has appeared or is forthcoming in Joyland, The Walrus, Hazlitt, and Dead Writers (Invisible Publishing, 2024). Her chapbook Third State of Being (Gaspereau Press, 2022) was a finalist for the bpNichol Chapbook Award. Cassidy was born in Regina, and currently lives in Toronto.

Tali Voron-Leiderman: Hi Cassidy! It’s an absolute pleasure to get to speak with you today. There are so many ways that we could start this interview, but perhaps it’s best we start with an introduction. You are incredibly accomplished and have already achieved so much in your career. You have published three poetry collections: Hacker Packer (2015), Drolleries (2019), and Crying Dress (2024). Hacker Packer was the winner of two Saskatchewan Book Awards and a finalist for the Gerald Lampert Award and Drolleries was shortlisted for the Raymond Souster Award. You have also published two chapbooks, Dead Writers—a collaborative work of novellas by four writers—is on the way in 2025, and you’ve been published widely across numerous literary magazines. The list of accolades goes on and on! What’s one thing our readers should know about you that they may not already?

Cassidy McFadzean: Thank you so much, Tali. I’m really excited for this interview and I’m so honored to be featured in The Ampersand Review.
I think one thing people might not know about me is I’ve been working as a poetry editor on a freelance basis. I’ve edited for poets like Domenica Martinello, Jacob McArthur Mooney, and Natasha Ramoutar. I’ve also had the exciting experience of editing for a press for the first time, so I worked with Paula Turcotte on her debut chapbook Permutations for Baseline Press, which just came out this summer. I really try to inhabit a poet’s work when I revise and give useful suggestions, and I really enjoy living in the world that they create through their poems.

TVL: That’s amazing. I knew that, but it’s always your work that comes to the forefront although you’re so involved on the editorial side as well.

CM: Yeah, it’s interesting to get outside of my own head and inhabit somebody else’s words and try to contribute in any useful way that I can. I’ve been really fortunate to have some great people in my life like Kevin Connolly, my editor at House of Anansi. He actually edited all three of my books, so if I’m able to do even a fraction of the work that he’s done, I’ll be happy.

TVL: You mentioned that you bring your perspective as a poet to your editing. Would you mind telling me more about that and what that looks like in practice?

CM: I tend to be sort of heavy with line editing, and I look at things like musicality, the particular lines of a poem, as well as form, and how the poem is read aloud. I do try to address larger anxieties the poet may have about the work, but the place I really shine is at the line level. In my role as Writer-in-Residence, that’s what I try to do with Sheridan students when we meet as well.

TVL: Editing is really an art as much as it is a skill. For poetry especially I think that comes through.

CM: I definitely agree with that.

TLV: You really do a little bit of everything. You are a poet. You write fiction and short stories. You’ve dabbled in non-fiction, as well, and you’re an editor, too. Is there a medium that you find comes to you most easily?

CM: Poetry definitely came more naturally to me in the beginning. I think this was due in part to having an incredible teacher, Medrie Purdham, at the University of Regina where I did my undergrad and my MA in English and Creative Writing. She just released her first book, Little Housewolf, and she really taught me about the role that fixed forms and structure can play in a poem as well as musicality. It kind of blew my mind open and I’ve been a poetry addict ever since.

TVL: I wonder, do you find yourself leaning toward either poetry or fiction? What guides you toward one form over the other? Is it dependent on the project that you’re working on, the topics or themes you’re exploring? How does it work for you?

CM: There tends to be a lot of overlap as I write about the same thing but in different forms. I’ve been working on my novel since 2018, and while it’s changed a lot, the current incarnation is a book about grief, displacement, and defamiliarization, which are all ideas that I write about in my poetry as well. Maybe it has to do with mood or working on a particular project, but there tends to be a lot of overlap. Maybe it’s just a different approach to the idea or the theme emerges in my poetry versus my fiction. It’s hard to say!

TVL: That makes a lot of sense. I definitely see that overlap between your poetry and your fiction, as well, but you explore these themes in different ways.

CM: One thing I’d like to do is channel the linguistic playfulness into my fiction. That’s sort of a goal that I’m hoping to explore in future works.

TVL: You’ve published two chapbooks and three poetry collections. How do you approach writing your collections and deciding on the order of the poems? Does your process change depending on whether you’re working on a chapbook or a full-length collection?

CM: It’s very much an intuitive process for me. I do feel a chapbook should be its own distinct work and not just an assortment of poems put together. For example, my first chapbook, Farwell, is a suite of poems set in Revelstoke, B.C., and my recent chapbook, Third State of Being, is a crown of sonnets, so the form really made sense for that project.
In a full-length poetry manuscript, I try to show some sort of arc throughout the book. In terms of what order the poems appear, my editor plays a big role in that. It’s so hard to tell when you’re in the weeds of the collection. Crying Dress was the first time that I played around with having different sections, so prior to that I had tried to build an arc with individual poems. In Crying Dress, I tried to separate the book into the seasons of the year. Even though I don’t think of the book as chronological, it kind of gives this impression of a year in the life or the cyclical transition between seasons, which I really like.

TVL: On the subject of Crying Dress, I wanted to talk a little bit about it next. The back cover blurb of Crying Dress describes the collection as “strikingly original poems [that] revel in musicality (rhyme, beat, and alliteration) while deploying puns, idiom, and other forms of linguistic play to create a dissonance that challenges the expected coherence of a poem.” The way you play with language is striking, sensory, and vivid; the images jump off the page. Do you feel that your craft as a poet has evolved over the course of your collections, and the years between them?

CM: Thank you. My first two books were a lot more structured, and I was playing with fixed forms such as the sestina or the pantoum. In my first book, there’s a lot of old English alliterative verse. I was writing these mock old English riddles that were really fun.
So, in Crying Dress, it’s not like there’s a lack of structure, but I wrote the book at a time when my life felt really chaotic. It was the middle of a global pandemic, my mom had just passed away suddenly, and then I moved to Brooklyn for my MFA, so a lot was going on. It felt like the old forms were no longer serving me and I think this is reflected in the poems, which maybe feel a little more fractured, a little more elliptical. There’s still a sense of playfulness, but I think meaning is obscured, which maybe speaks to the fact that the world felt unintelligible at that time.

TVL: It’s so interesting that you were writing at a time when you were in this moment of great transition and chaos. But then you put that order into the collection by giving it structure through seasons. It’s empowering to feel in control, even if it’s imposing a sense of order after the fact, when the moment you’re living in feels out of control.

CM: That’s a really good point. Even though things felt a little chaotic, the days kept passing and I couldn’t help but give myself over to the changing of seasons, which were maybe the only things I could rely on at that point.
I also want to say that the writing of the poems was also different. For the first two books, I would get an idea for a poem and write it down. In Crying Dress in particular, a lot of poems were actually composed on my phone. I would text myself lines while walking around! So maybe that also speaks to a slight shift in form.

TVL: Do you find that you’re still working in that way now, or has your writing process changed since then?

CM: I haven’t written a lot of poems because I’ve mainly been focusing on fiction, but the new ones I’ve written, yes, they have been composed in that sort of phone-notes-to-myself mode. I don’t know. I tend to write in pairs. I feel like my first two books were really similar and maybe Crying Dress and whatever comes next might have echoes between them as well.

TVL: This feels like a natural point to talk a little bit more about your writing process. You’ve already given some insight with how you have been writing poems on your phone. But I’m also curious if you have any writing rituals or traditions, or anything really specific that you do to get into the right headspace?

CM: I don’t have specific rituals, but right now I’m working on a novel and I try to write as soon as I wake up. First thing in the morning is when I feel most productive, when my brain is closer to that half-awake dream state, and I’m perhaps not quite as self-critical as I might otherwise be. That’s the ideal day. Waking up, having tea, sitting at my computer. Of course, it isn’t always possible, since my partner and I now have a puppy—walking him in the morning sort of takes precedence, but I think it’s important to be flexible as well. I’ve also started writing during my commute. I can usually feel this nagging urge when I haven’t written for a while. If I’m sitting at a coffee shop, maybe I can squeeze in a few moments, or I can work at the airport. Ideally, I love to write first thing in the morning at home. But you know, life takes over and then you find yourself crouched over your laptop on the GO bus.

TVL: I know the feeling. So, you try to write every day, then?

CM: I do. Some days are more productive than others, and definitely on the weekend I do want to spend time with my partner and make room for social time. But when I don’t write every day, I do feel this sort of nagging urge that I should be writing.

TVL: I really relate to that nagging urge that you described. I’m curious, how much time has to pass before you feel it?

CM: Yeah, if I don’t write for the full day, then in the evening I’ll start to feel it. My body forces me to work in the evening when I usually like to read or watch TV, or be a little more relaxed. If I haven’t written in a few days, it will become quite ... dire. That would be the word. And then I’ll have to make room for it.
When I’m travelling, I don’t usually tend to write as much. I haven’t really gone anywhere lately, but when I’m travelling for an event, things tend to shift a little bit.

TVL: Thank you for that. I’m so excited for your forthcoming work of fiction, Dead Writers, which will be published in 2025 by Invisible Publishing. Very briefly, this work is described as a “collaborative omnibus-style fiction project, four writers navigate the protean concept of the “bargain” in novella-length stories.” The novellas are written by you, Jean Marc Ah-Sen, Michael LaPointe, and Naben Ruthnum. How did Dead Writers come to be, and what was it like to work on a collaborative project like this?

CM: I’m really excited for the book. It was born out of Jean Marc’s brilliant and insane mind. He initially had the idea for twelve stand-alone novellas, but that was an immense undertaking, so they morphed into these anthologies, and I’m really excited to be in the one with Jean Marc, Michael, and Naben. I’m really happy that my fiction debut is alongside these three writers that I admire so much. On a practical note, it’s been really useful having three other people to discuss things. like the title or the cover art, which you’re usually navigating on your own or texting your friends about. This way I can consult with the co-authors and I feel like our works speak to each other in an interesting way. It creates this sense of unease in the collection as a whole. I’m excited to hear what readers think.

TVL: I have to ask, when you all came together, did you have the concept and then everybody went off to write a novella based on it, or were there discussions about how everybody was going to approach this? Or did everybody already have a novella that seemed to fit?

CM: It varied. I had a piece that I revisited and revised. Others either wrote it for the project or they already had a piece, but the book came about in an organic way. It’s really a range, but it definitely came about in a very organic way. We realized afterward that all of our pieces spoke to the idea of the bargain in some way. So maybe each of us intuitively were writing stories that trended toward the supernatural or the unknown with a creepy angle.

TVL: That’s pretty amazing. You’ve moved around quite a bit throughout your career. You were born in Regina, lived in Iowa and Brooklyn, and now you’re based in Toronto. I’m curious, how does place inspire, affect, or influence your writing?

CM: Moving around so much has definitely influenced my writing, but it’s only after leaving a place that I can write about it. Part of this has to do with yearning for the past, which isn’t always helpful, but sometimes can be. Ruminating on a place inspires me to write about it.
I definitely miss my family and friends; the longer I’m away from Saskatchewan, the more I’ve started to process childhood and early years, as well as appreciating things about Regina that I didn’t recognize at the time. I hope I can spend more time in Saskatchewan in the future. There’s such an incredible writing community there, which has been really supportive, and I’ve tried to stay in touch. Yeah, in a strange way it’s only after leaving a place that I start to process it through my writing. That being said, I do have a story forthcoming in The Walrus called “Forest Hill Gothic,” which is about a neighbourhood in Toronto that I wrote after coming back from Brooklyn, so maybe my process is starting to change a little.

TVL: Third State of Being, your chapbook published with Gaspereau Press, was a finalist for the bpNichol Chapbook Award. You have also published poems and short stories in various literary magazines like Hazlitt, The Walrus, Joyland, Maisonneuve, and long con to name a few. What role do you think micro presses, chapbooks, and literary magazines play in our literary ecosystem?

CM: Chapbooks, literary magazines, and micropresses play a vital role in serving as sites of experimentation or play. They appear a lot more quickly than books without some of the same constraints. In a lot of ways, they capture the most exciting work that poets and writers are publishing long before it appears in a book form. Working with editors at the magazine to polish them up a little bit, or even seeing who else is being published in the same issue can be really exciting. And oftentimes magazines might have a particular thematic prompt for that issue. It can be generative to write toward that prompt or revise a work that is leaning in that direction and see where it takes you.

TVL: Thank you; I agree! The next couple of questions I have are about your experiences with your MFAs. You have completed an MFA in poetry from the Iowa Writers’ Workshop and an MFA in fiction from Brooklyn College. I’m so intrigued by your decision to pursue not one, but two, MFAs in two different genres. Can you share what that journey was like?

CM: It’s a little embarrassing, but I think in practical terms, I did the second MFA after my mom passed away right after COVID was really at its height. I just needed a change of scenery and what better way than moving to Brooklyn for two years surrounded by new classmates, new professors, and a new environment? My MFA in poetry was earlier on in my career, but I always wanted to write fiction. I never put that dream away, but I also felt like I couldn’t take my fiction to the same level on my own. So the timing was right in 2021 when I moved to Brooklyn to pursue the dream of an MFA in fiction. Immersing myself in that community of fiction writers for two years in the Brooklyn College environment really allowed me to focus on developing my craft in a way that I hadn’t before. So even though it’s a little embarrassing to have two MFAs, I’m grateful for those two experiences.

TVL: I don’t think it’s embarrassing at all; I think it’s incredible. Your commitment to honing your craft in two genres is inspiring. Do you feel that your MFA in poetry then informed how you approached your fiction writing when you were at Brooklyn College, too?

CM: Interesting. I hadn’t thought about that. They were so different. In Iowa, you’re sort of in this small city away from everything from the writing scene in a lot of ways. Whereas in Brooklyn, you’re right at the heart of it. There are so many readings every night and literary parties where you really have to build your work ethic to stay home and write.

TVL: So, they were two distinctly different experiences.

CM: Yeah, definitely. But they’re both studio-focused and focused on craft and on close-reading others’ work and surrounding yourself with really passionate classmates.

TVL: A common question among aspiring writers is whether an MFA is a necessary credential for pursuing a writing career. I’m curious to hear what your thoughts are on this and if you think there are any considerations that a writer should make before pursuing an MFA.

CM: Of course an MFA is not essential. I am aware of financial constraints that might make moving away for two years challenging for an emerging writer or someone with family responsibilities. If a writer wants to pursue an MFA, my advice would be to focus on programs that offer full funding. I think it’s also possible to recreate a DIY MFA environment through taking classes, for example. There are so many Zoom classes on- line or joining a writing group where you can critique one another’s work. And of course, nothing can replace reading widely and voraciously as a way to hack your own MFA. If you’re not able to upend your life for two years, I think there are other ways to devote yourself to your craft.

TVL: Not to put you on the spot, but are there any resources that you can think of off the top of your head that we can point our readers to that could get them started?

CM: The Flying Books School of Reading & Writing is where you can work one-on-one with various mentors in different genres. I was working with them prior to becoming Sheridan’s Writer-in-Residence and I’m hoping to work with them again in the future. There’s also the U of T School of Continuing Studies. I know a lot of great writers offer workshops there and more and more writers are offering classes over Zoom. A lot of my friends will advertise their online workshops on Instagram, like André Babyn is offering a fiction class now, and I’m sure he will again in the future. Poets like Sarah Burgoyne and Jaclyn Deforges also offer Zoom classes, and I have in the past, and maybe one day will again in the future. Also, retreats like the Sage Hill writing experience are incredible. Sage Hill is in Saskatchewan and I attended that twice and it was really important to my development as a poet.

TVL: Thank you so much. So much of writing life happens off the page through readings, festivals, workshops, participating in writing groups and more. Can you speak to the role that community engagement plays in your life as a writer?

CM: Writing can be such a solitary act that these moments of community building are really precious. Attending readings or taking classes allows emerging writers to meet like-minded individuals who are equal- ly passionate about this thing we’re all trying to do, which is write. Even for myself, going to a festival, going to reading, or if you’re able to attend a retreat, I always walk away feeling really inspired and rejuvenated. I think part of being a writer is the solitary moments of actually sitting at your desk and writing. But equally important is meeting other writers and engaging with the community.

TVL: Absolutely. Thank you. Before we get to our last question, I have to throw this in here ... what’s your favourite word at the moment?

CM: I tend to go through phases of using the same word. For a while it was “propulsive,” and recently it’s been “juncture.” I wouldn’t say either of those are my favourites but for whatever reason I can’t stop saying them!

TVL: Lastly, what is the best piece of advice, related to writing or not, that you have ever received?

CM: I don’t know if it was directly stated to me, but the implicit advice is that you can get all the feedback from all the writers in the world, from your classmates, from all these courses that one takes. But it’s really important to hone your own instincts for what you want a piece to say. You want your work to stay true to your vision for a piece of writing. So, of course it’s important to stay flexible and to take the opinions of people that you trust into consideration. But at the end of the day, it’s your story or your poem. Your name is going to be on it. So, honing your instincts is really important.

TVL: I love that. That’s excellent advice, and it is quite empowering. Thank you so much for chatting with me, Cassidy. I have taken so many pearls of wisdom from our conversation. I will leave you with the final word. Is there anything else you would like to share with our readers?

CM: Thank you so much for these thoughtful questions! I’m looking forward to publishing more fiction in 2025, with pieces coming out in Hazlitt, The Walrus, and of course, Dead Writers. Working with Invisible Publishing has been an amazing experience and I’m excited to join their roster.

What You Carry

In the memory, I am seven, standing at the back of a closet, running shoes on the hardwood floor, the mothballed smell of my grandmother’s lambswool coat pressed into my face. I am little, but my sister is smaller still, a year and a bit younger than me. In the memory, I have pulled the closet door shut, and this seems against all odds because the knob is on the outside. I know I am afraid because I have almost caught my fingers in pulling the folding door tight, leaving a little gap where the light comes through—a place where I can put my fingers again to push the door out afterward. After he’s passed by.

The closet can’t be very big, but it seems so in memory because I am small. If I look down, I can see blue summer shorts, a striped T-shirt, a skinned knee that’s healing from a fall off my bike, and my feet are far, far below me. How am I able to be there while I’m also—at the same time—in this body now, at forty-eight? I wonder how I’m back there in my grandparents’ bedroom closet, while I’m meditating in a friend’s borrowed house in St. John’s, on a Thursday morning in May. It’s short, the little film in my head. It shouldn’t, by all logic and reason, be something that will suddenly emerge after forty years without warning. But it does.

In this one memory, there is terror. This is not a first time, then, but one in a series of moments, one of many memories that have not been allowed out. In time, in this time, I am in my woman’s body, sitting cross-legged on a hardwood floor, a pale beam of light splicing across the sofa and then spilling onto the patterned blue swirl of a rug. My legs are tired after a long walk down Duckworth Street—past Queen’s Road, then Bond, Gower, and back up by way of Prescott Street and so many tipsy, coloured houses. There’s takeout coffee from the Parlour on Military Road sitting next to my knee, half-drunk and growing cold.

In this, my adult body, a seven-year-old’s memory sets fire to cells that jitter; muscles that twitch, ready to run; lungs that go staccato— breath quiet, then hyperventilating; and a woman’s heart that hammers as a child’s in her chest. No hide-and-seek. Just fear. In this, my own body but not my own, I am somehow seven again. There is the floor beneath my feet, the feeling and texture of the coat against my skin, the smell of cardboard shoeboxes, and the slight, weighted press of my sister’s body behind me.

I have pushed her to the back of the closet, turned her round so she can’t see. She trembles. I feel that now, the press of the backs of her summer-bare arms against the backs of mine. I hush her, slow my breathing, knowing he isn’t far. If we hide here, he will go past. If we hide, I will see his shadow pass by the crack in the door. There are two doors to my grandparents’ bedroom. I will wait until he has come in by the room’s first door, gone by the long closet, and moved out through the second door. If we are quiet, we will be safe, able to run once he has gone out. If he doesn’t find us, this time, we will escape, tracing the path he has just walked: out through the kitchen, past the small, pink-tiled bathroom, down the short flight of stairs, and out into the backyard. I will be able to save the littler one. Where to go, afterward, I don’t know.

The girl who is seven doesn’t know. She only feels her heart, trapped in her mouth; feels sweat, dripping down between her bony shoulder blades. She faces out, arms wide, too sacrificial for seven: a saviour, in her stiped T-shirt and solid blue shorts, in guise of crucifixion. Her face is my face. In memory, this breath—caught like a bird in my chest—is only ever hers.


My paternal grandfather’s house stood next to my parents’ house. If you asked me to describe it, I would begin by telling you that the furnace was always on, too hot. The air always seemed to smell of over-boiled carrots and dried-out roast beef. The 1950s chesterfield was turquoise-blue, raised fabric with carved flowers, discreetly tufted in design. There were tiny china vases full of sculpted flowers. There were cheap sliding windows that were never opened, so that the house seemed trapped within itself, unable to breathe. The curtains were always drawn, so sunlight never entered. There was a television with an antenna on top, and the sounds of Lawrence Welk’s creepy cult of matching blue dresses and tuxedos singing on a Sunday night. And there was a guest bedroom with two twin beds that wore matching mustard-coloured coverlets, the only art being a few framed images of women in pink and green gowns with parasols, as if life had stopped in the late 1800s.

There was a copy of a children’s Bible, with pictures of a glowing, haloed Jesus who seemed to hover in midair like a strange superhero, and a drawer with board games. There were endless bowls of summer peas to quietly hull in the shadowed dark of a garage, and endless cobs of corn to pull tassels from in preparation for quiet, uncomfortable suppers. There were dark corners in a shadowed basement, full of woodworking tools and machines that hummed, coughed, and ate wood faster than anything else I’d ever seen.

And then there was my grandmother, who wore cheap flowered housecoats with snap buttons over her underwear on hot days, and there was my grandfather, whose face never really opened itself to kindness, intimidating us at the best of times. There was silence and fear, along with hard-to-remember rules and regulations. If you forgot them, there were punishments. Sometimes you’d be locked outside, not let back inside the house until you had cried for some time, until your tears had dried on your face, and then you had to promise to try harder to be better. Being locked outside was normal to me then, even though now I know it was anything but all right. When you’re seven, you trust the grownups.

Children were meant to be seen and not heard. We were meant to fall asleep quickly, and my grandfather would always stand—silhouetted in the doorway as a shadowy figure against the brightness of a hall light—listening to our breathing, to be sure we were sleeping. Talking after the lights were turned out wasn’t acceptable. Sometimes pretending to be asleep led to us falling asleep, which was easier than being terrified while awake.

Sleep was linked to fear, so sleep never came easily. Years later, as an adult, well-meaning friends would say, “Try a sleep clinic,” or “It must be perimenopause,” but I knew that there was something else under there. And so, even sleep—which was a country into which you were supposed to be able to fall into as easily as you would fall into love—was taken from me. Innocence, too, would find itself stolen, without warning, and not even remembered until much later, not until forty-eight, when my life had just seemed to settle into itself.


People say the first memory opens a door to others, that they will slide into one another, push through your mind until a slow-motion film plays on the inside of your eyelids when you try to sleep. Sometimes, though, it’s just one memory.

The trigger will be a dagger stuck under your ribs in the replica of a Shakespearean duel: it will hurt—a quick jab and thrust—and take your breath away. Your lungs collapse and your breath will be taken. What comes after it, the memory, will take you to your knees, to the floor if you aren’t already there yet. You will shake, your body feeling as if it has broken apart from you, splintered. Everything will feel sharp and bloody. You will not know why it’s happening, this tsunami, and for the first weeks you will wander around trying to look as if you haven’t lost your mind.

You will think that you are mad, wonder whether your mind is splitting into alternate personalities. You will question your own health and well-being, think that others will, too, and so you won’t be able to bear being around other people for a while. Nothing will seem real in the first weeks and months after a memory surfaces. Everything will seem uncertain and unanchored. You will fear those friends who are closest, because they will be the few who are able to see through your mumblings of “I’m fine.” They will know you too well, and you will not have the energy to maintain a facade of normalcy. You will tell very few because the shame of the memory makes you both angry and sad, and you cry when you least expect it.

You can’t bear to be held because you feel weak. If someone shows you kindness, you weep. You cannot let down your walls, for fear of further breakage. It explains so much of why you do what you do. You build walls. You don’t know how to receive love, but only how to give it. Afterward, you’ll begin to understand that you’ve been weeping for the little girl whose innocence was stolen.


I couldn’t tell how much time had passed on the morning of the memory’s arrival. I didn’t know the time, but I wandered upstairs, past the photo of an iceberg, and took a long, hot shower. I cried, knowing that the sound of water pounding would stop anyone in the house next door from hearing me through the thin wall. I didn’t know why I was crying, except I suddenly realized that none of the memories I had in my head from my childhood would ever match the new one. That didn’t make sense, so I wrapped a towel around my body and sat shaking on the edge of the tub for another period of undefined time, finally getting to my feet to text my sister.

“Do you remember this?”

It was a simple question followed by a short description of a scene in a bedroom closet, of someone protecting someone else, an older sister with arms outstretched to stop whatever was outside the closet door from coming in and causing harm. Then the quick response: “Yes. I never forgot, and now you’ve remembered.” Breath caught, knowing that she had known for decades, but not shared or spoken of it. Another kick in the gut, blow to the heart. It was not her memory to tell, but mine to remember. She knew that.

Winded, wrapped in that bath towel, hair wet and curls tousled, I walked down the short hall to the bedroom, wrapped my arms around myself. I felt the hem of the towel with my fingers, knowing its fabric and texture was real. I perched on the bed’s edge, alone and broken. I kept looking down at my feet, bare against the floor. I kept trying to breathe.

Days later, there was a long trip from Newfoundland to Ontario, followed by weeks of hiding, nesting, gathering in to feel safe. Therapy, to try and sort out how things work, and why they work (or don’t), and trying to figure out how I could put myself together again after I’d been broken. Long nights spent sitting, two dogs next to me on a mid-June sofa. My eyes wandered, searched the walls, the sharp corners of familiar rooms, looking for answers to questions that I knew I’ll likely never find.


Sometimes, you carry things you can’t remember, or that your body doesn’t want you to recall. Therapy says: “Not your fault,” “buried deep in your mind, to protect you,” “not you now, but just a memory,” and “can’t hurt you.” And then Therapy says: “Find a picture of yourself when you were little. Write a letter to her.” And you feel your stomach clench, heart ache, eyes prick with tears. You think of Newfoundland, and of time spent sitting on a shoreline, watching icebergs, just a few weeks ago. You think “how has this happened?” and then “can I erase it?” But you can’t. It’s arrived, Therapy tells you, because you are healthy, ready to heal deeper wounds. You scoff when Therapy asks you to write letters to yourself as a child, or even worse, to your grandfather. What will you say?

To the first, you will say this: “I tried to protect you, but I was too small then.” To the second, you will say: “Bastard,” “You ruined me,” and “You left me in pieces.” Neither letter will solve the problem or heal any wound. There are darker memories that hide behind the bedroom closet one.

You will sit in a therapist’s office and stare at a painting on the wall above her head. You will not be able to look her in the eyes.

“Why can’t you look me in the eyes?”

“I can’t ...”

Further prodding. “Why not? Remember when you were sick, you couldn’t look people in their eyes? What was it?”

A sigh. “Shame. Embarrassment.” A litany of words, a string of rosary beads that leads back forty years or more.

And then, your question to her: “Why? Why now?”

Her answer, “Why not now? When better?”

So much anger, a wave that rises, catches in your throat, makes your hands clench up into fists. “What?”

The brain, she tells you, is complex. It buries memories that threaten your survival. It boxes them up, draws curtains around sharp edges so that you can survive, grow up, be productive. It’s only when you’re older, healthier, that the mind relaxes, lets down its guard, thinks it might be okay to breathe.

Memory is a liar. The time you thought was safest, healthiest, was that time before you were ten. Now, you know that it was that time that caused you the greatest harm, made you sick and led you to be suicidal and depressed in your thirties, only releasing its grip on you in your forties, as you began to live in a healthier way.

Memory is a liar, and who can tell what’s real? The grandfather who stood on the other side of the closet doors knew it was wrong. The grandmother also knew. Churchgoing folks, steadfast. Made pies for church suppers, built wooden pews, seemed like upstanding citizens.

The little girls knew it was wrong, too.

Inside that house, though, God looked the other way. Maybe He couldn’t see because the sun was too bright one day, got in His eyes and blinded Him. Or maybe He was too busy singing hymns in the church on the hill. Or maybe it was so hot that He thought it was hell in the house, didn’t much like it, and so didn’t think to look twice. It doesn’t matter. What happened did happen, can’t be altered or erased.

What you thought was real just isn’t. The maps have been blown apart and the people you thought you knew and loved aren’t the ones you remember. The centres cannot hold. The poem unravels, the sweater unfurls, the flower wilts. Trust will always be a hard thing to navigate, for how can you trust anyone when the people you thought loved you actually hurt you?

And how can you trust a man after one has so badly hurt you? Who would have the patience?

The things you carry with you are heavy and painful. The memory that steps forward—of two little girls hiding in a closet from a grandfather—doesn’t need a sequel. It doesn’t need other memories to follow because it is damaging enough. It upends a woman’s life. It leaves her spinning in a storm, without an anchor, lost at sea.

Things you carry are ghosts of the past. They are invisible to anyone but you because you feel them as they carve a hole out in the centre of your chest. You must carry them. You must speak with them, acknowledge that they happened—these darker things—so that you can put them down on the edge of a northern lake. You must offer them some pale shade of acknowledgement, for having helped to make you who you are, even if who you are right now feels more broken than whole.

There comes a place and a time, too, when you must put them down.

You will put them down, on the shore of a lake, at the base of a pine, and you will look up to the sun, shading your eyes with your hand.

You will put them down, these things, and you will breathe in some kind of peace.

You must believe this will happen.

You must.


In the memory, I am about seven. What age I am does not really matter, not after all these years. I am little, but still bigger than my sister. I am lost, but brave, willing to take the brunt of it all to protect the littler one.

In my life, now, I am older—brave, stubborn, and persistent. In my life, now, I take the memory down to the water and place it under a tall pine. The little girl who I was then sits inside me, watching. Her heart beats in my chest, a caged bird trying to escape. Her heart flutters, breath catching.

I breathe in, then out. I open my mouth and close my eyes. I open my mouth to speak with my voice, to sing, to let her fly out—this little bird, wings wide, stretched out over blue water.



KIM FAHNER

lives in Sudbury, Ontario. Her novel, The Donoghue Girl (Latitude 46), was published in 2024, and her next book of poems, The Pollination Field (Turnstone), will be published in 2025. Kim is First Vice Chair of The Writers’ Union of Canada, and was a finalist for the 2023 Ralph Gustafson Poetry Contest.

 

AMBER DAWN

Hostile Architecture

I’ve learned to live with the inevitability of a third armrest
Actually, that’s a tired lie. I haven’t learned to live

I haven’t learned to distinguish myself
from the surroundings. I am something
like stripped timber screws and pressure-
treated skin, a thermoplastic-coated steel
pubic crest. Centre bar split, a magician’s
assistant perpetually being sawed in half
Abracadabra
Hostile architecture

I haven’t learned to live
in a city that caps the shaded
anchor of Ironworkers Bridge in concrete teeth.
Store frontages along Main Street edged with stone spikes

once I stood in a gutted bus shelter with an old timer
drinking soup-kitchen coffee in Styrofoam cups. We recited
the Serenity Prayer, our common balm, our last gasp solace
the serenity
the things I cannot change

once I was loitering
actually, that’s a tired lie or a federal law, same difference.
once I was charged with loitering. Stop
and frisk street check on the corner of Semlin and Pandora
a disturbance or obstruction, no peace, no quiet. I was
something like suspicious circumstances and reasonable
grounds, a mental danger. I was a teenage girl

in a city public space is malignant. Abnormal mass
spreading to bone and nerve and it hurts to lie

down

a third armrest
is never about rest

AMBER DAWN

is a writer and educator living on the unceded territories of the Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh First Nations (Vancouver, Canada). Her third poetry collection, Buzzkill Clamshell, is forthcoming in Spring 2025.

 DAVID BARRICK

Shin Godzilla (2016)

For David Ly

thrashes 
across my laptop screen, 
keeling like an oil tanker 
off Tokyo Bay
and growing, growing 
thick gristle, smoked meat gills 
leaking, washing highways— 
tires bursting in a low boil 
of blood.
It pains me to see 
his pain emanating
in this petrochemical flood, 
igniting from all pores, atomic 
mirror ball dicing fighter jets, 
bisecting skyscrapers. 
For every crisis

there is a board meeting. 
Folded hands, fine suits, 
appalled faces. This is how
it must have felt to watch 
his immolations in 1954 how it feels 
       to doom scroll 
endless unequal and opposite 
reactions. The feed is feverish
these days—chaotic
ballet cascading
   beyond my window frame
I wish to slow it
down     to sleep, to freeze
this mitosis
at the tip
of whatever is coming next

DAVID BARRICK

is the author of the poetry collection Nightlight (Palimpsest Press, 2022) as well as two chapbooks. His poems have been published in Grain, Best Canadian Poetry 2024, The Fiddlehead, The Malahat Review, Arc Poetry, and other literary journals. He is the managing director of the Antler River Poetry reading series and teaches writing at Western University in London, Ontario.

 JONATHAN BESSETTE

If Wilderness Is An Ouroboros, Then Your Voice Speaks Eternities Either We Had Arisen From Planting, Or Out Of Many Different Soils.

Jazz vocalists lured me into
bracken to meet your curvaceous
ivy, constricting my attempts
to shower you in flower petals

My only habit of excessive
became incessant bouquets
built a time-lapse decay at
the river of your gestures

We circled inward under a glowing
canopy of melting cedar and hemlock
pine cone, murmured April in Paris

mmmm mmmmm  mmmm  mm mmm

Your skin. Smooth as waxy
salal. Hair. As soft as Old Man’s
Beard. Our entwined bodies.
Flowed. Sisyphean streams. Pushing
each other. Up a hill to nowhere.

Sitting in underbrush, I tickled at matrimonial
ideas with fronds of a deer fern, while you
pricked with spiked leaves of invasive holly

I preached, the socialist fungus, their
symbiotic redistribution. All you had
to offer, a limp stem of foam flower,
like wet envelopes falling out a mailbox

Nightfall

Crickets owls frogs sirens?

We buried ourselves in damp
fronds, beneath a mountain
ash that might protect us from
evil spirits overflowing our recesses

In this primeval forest, innocence 
became a kind of ritual, exploring
failed romantic, simple as spores
or windblown pollen, subtle like
parthenogenesis or outcrossing

In sunrise golds, I fed you red
huckleberries, and you stared 
until I faded from sunbaked
granite, returning to the wreath
of our hydrological cycle

JONATHAN BESSETTE’S

writing is informed by many hobbies, including astrology, gaming, gardening, and anarchism. He̓ lives in the unceded and traditional territories of the xwməθkwəy̓ əm (Musqueam), səl ilwətaɁɬ (Tsleil-Waututh), and Sḵwx̱ wú7mesh (Squamish) Nations, so-called Vancouver. He’s published poetry in The Capilano Review and CV2, nonfiction in Adbusters and Quill and Quire, and fiction in The Antigonish Review and Carte Blanche.

 Y.S. LEE

God, Spoon, Fork

“If your rice is served in a bowl, use chopsticks. If it’s served on a flat plate, use a combination fork and spoon.”
Frommer’s “Etiquette in Singapore”

“break, blow, burn, and make me new”
—Donne, “Holy Sonnet 14”

It’s damn hard to eat rice off a plate with chopsticks, so you 
Adopt Sheffield-forged cutlery: bright, stainless. These amend 
Your reputation with the British, demonstrate how you’ll bend 
To their stiff little rituals, litany of thank-yous, bless-yous, new 
You—and what for? You swear you’ve learned all that’s due 
Yet they still smirk, titter, dismiss. (You’ll be a peon to the end.) 
The old ones grow suspicious of this hybrid state, but you defend 
It as pragmatic. Essential. Spoons scrape! Forks stab! It’s true! 
Then the church and its mummeries. At first, you had to feign 
Piety, suffer the prim homilies of an old colonial enemy. 
But now you savour the parched wafer—yes, again, feed me again— 
Laid on your tongue by a pale-eyed father. You learn to say I,
Not we, conflate penance with prayer, identify as free.
Now, cold steel at your ancestral meal clangs Jesus loves me

Y. S. LEE

is the winner of CV2’s 2022 Foster Poetry Prize. Her lyric essay “Tek Tek” was shortlisted for the 2022 CBC Nonfiction Prize and her fiction includes the YA mystery series The Agency (Candlewick Press). Her debut picture book, Mrs. Nobody, is forthcoming from Groundwood Books.

Manahil Bandukwala

Domenica Martinello, GOOD WANT

Toronto: Coach House Books, 2024. $23.95

Domenica Martinello’s Good Want shifts from profound to funny and back again. The collection is structured in four sections. The first three open with poems beginning with the phrase “I Pray”; the fourth and final section breaks from this pattern, and opens with the titular poem, “Good Want.” Right from the beginning, Martinello raises questions about the differences between praying and wanting. One has a religious connotation, while the other feels more tied to the everyday.

Martinello opens with two epigraphs, one from Mary Ruefle, and one from Hera Lindsay Bird. The latter of the two riffs on Mary Oliver’s “Wild Geese,” stating: “You do not have to be good. / Being good isn’t even the point anymore.” The collection then shifts into the opening poem, “I Pray to be Useful,” where Martinello writes: “I could not keep my gaze downcast, / humble, groundward. / I could not fast.” Already there is an expectation of the speaker’s “lack of goodness.” And yet, the epigraph has instructed the opposite. Will the speaker listen to the epigraph’s instructions, or will she continue mulling over where her goodness falls short?

The poet oscillates between the sacred and the profane and has a playful time doing so. Oftentimes, the line between sacred as religion and sacred as poetry, or as an art form, blurs. In “Power Ballad (Hymn),” Martinello writes directly to an experience many writers and artists are familiar with—writing grant applications:

Tell the nice officer of the arts 
about the time your dad 

took the metro at midnight 
to Burger King 
on Christmas Eve 

but make it a metaphor 
about piety and meat. 
I assume all the artists are lying 

and I lie too. 

Underneath the humour of these lines is a suggestion of the guilt of success, at whether the fulfilling of a want is earned. And yet, the poem closes embracing the imperfectness of wanting and its results.

Martinello’s speakers take on different forms of life to grapple with how we want in different situations in our lives. In “Solstice,” the speaker “was a daughter plant / squeezing the soft earth too tightly, / trying nightly to will myself green.” Can the fact that we want something so deeply be all that is needed to undergo a transformative change? Again, her speaker shifts with each dream in “In Bad Dreams,” asking “What does it mean / to dream in the cadence of animal / suffering, in the refrain / of oops.” There’s always a surprise in Martinello’s language. Lines of poetry shift from talking about “[slipping] sunlight / into our purses, down our slips” to “horse metaphors / even for those of us / with zero access to a horse” to one’s “stomach [growling] / a low, evil frequency” in a confession booth. This isn’t a book that lets you get comfortable. Instead, unexpected speakers, instances, and thoughts appear on every page.

Mary Oliver appears in Good Want as more than just a reference in an epigraph. “On the Day Mary Oliver Died” upholds Oliver’s gentle poetics while also poking fun at the seriousness of poetry and those who consider certain poetry beneath them. For Martinello, everything is poetry, from cliché sunsets to having your period on the bus. “If you find this trite that’s on you / blood drips pastorally down my leg,” she writes. The sarcasm underlying the tone, present in a number of poems, is comforting. Rather than being self-conscious about her period, Martinello’s speaker is self-aware; she reflects on her own journey and through her poems, invites the reader into “the gutter of [her] imagination / that imperfect escape hatch.”

The book closes first with forgiveness—“I forgive you for not understanding this loose gesture, / as I forgive everyone, everything”— and then with permission: “Domenica, when you learned / to say no // that was your power / And when you learned to say yes / and to keep on saying it // That was your power too.” Martinello does not make herself or her reader choose between the two.

Despite the precarity of capitalism, girlhood, finances, or life itself, the poems carry on. We keep wanting, and we can keep on wanting, and no one can declare that want bad or good. Even though there is so much out of our control, these poems remind us that our choices, and our actions, belong to us, and there is something good within that realization.

MANAHIL BANDUKWALA

is a writer and visual artist. She is the author of Heliotropia (Brick Books, 2024) and MONUMENT (Brick Books, 2022). Along with her sister, Nimra, she co-founded Reth aur Reghistan, a multidisciplinary project exploring folklore from Pakistan through poetry and sculpture. Through the project, she has published Women Wide Awake (Mawenzi House, 2023).

See her work at manahilbandukwala.com

 Rachelle-Anne Lawka

Kayla Czaga, MIDWAY
Toronto: House of Anansi Press, 2024. $21.99

In Kayla Czaga’s third collection of poetry, Midway, grief is a palpable creature that winds its body tenderly around each poem, appearing noncommittal in its various manifestations. Here, grief is both the juxtaposing face of “Marge Simpson in a windstorm” and “[t]he saddest creature on earth / [bobbing] in a foggy tank / in [a] Vietnamese restaurant / on the corner of Main & 33rd.” Midway is an unconventional narrative that pushes beyond comfort and welcomes a messy, nonsensical, gritty, and ugly mourning that is profoundly human. In poetry, the articulation of loss—of finding your steepled body bent over, submerged in the thick taste of mourning—is surely not uncommon. Yet, through Czaga’s insightful, lyrical narrative, the immovable, sticky, and complex tresses of grief are transformed into an exquisite and daring—at times darkly humorous—exploration of not only the loss of one’s parents but also the freshly fragmented markers of their presence that linger long after their bodies have ceased to exist.

Through her deeply personal lyrical “I,” Czaga invites the reader to embody the speakers’ thoughts, feelings, and actions, ultimately allowing them to inhabit the spaces of the poems and become complicit in the narrative of the collection as it unfolds. Czaga’s grief becomes our grief. Individually and collectively, readers experience the humanness of loss that often materializes in the most mundane of places, like “a stack of Lotto Max / half an inch thick,” or a perpetual reminder to, despite its temptations, “not watch reruns of Law & Order” and stick with the difficult process of grieving to see it through.

Midway continuously attempts to express the incomprehensible feelings associated with loss. In “I Have Never Written a Poem About My Father,” the speaker wrestles with the idea of having written numerous poems about a father and his life, but never an intimate word about who he was and who he became when his body betrayed him—when age and mortality shaped the contours of his anatomy into something unfamiliar. Czaga conveys the inexpressible, almost devastating notion of how grief transforms what conventionally might be considered ugly or taboo. There is a sense of guilt in Czaga’s admission that:

the reason
[her] father fell asleep on the toilet was because
he’d worked graveyard shifts for so many years
that regular sleep had died in him and it was only
zombie sleep he could have at that point,
gobbling up his brains when he didn’t see it coming.

Beyond the toilet and the graveyard shifts, there is also a sense of shame in the disclosure that “he worked / these shifts for [her] mother and [her], so that they could eat / and go shopping.” Czaga does not shy away from the blunt edges of complicity and culpability. Still, there is comfort here in the shared knowledge that, through the loss of a loved one, almost every individual harbours some form of complicated, often self-inflicted and undeserved guilt at what they have done, and all that they have not.

Midway masterfully blends together the unpredictable, incongruous, and throat-thickening range of loss. As the poet journeys through the underworld to visit her father, we too are taken on a voyage of elegy, revela- tion, and the final requiem by a child for their lost parent. From seemingly mundane spaces and objects—a restaurant, a polyp, Santa Claus, a Coho salmon—Czaga paints a picture of loss from the fragments of magic they contain, assuring us through a fortune cookie that “You will have a care- free life” at the end of all this grief, in the poem “A Carefree Life.” In this way, Czaga upends and transforms the traditional, rigid expectations of what and how grief is, transforming Midway into a meditation on the myriad ways that loss manifests itself as we learn to live with it.

RACHELLE-ANNE LAWKA

(she/her) is an emerging Canadian poet and student in her fourth year of Sheridan College’s Honours BA in Creative Writing & Publishing. She has been published, or has forthcoming work in Arrival Magazine, PRISM International, and The Familiars. In her spare time when she is not writing or painting, she can be found reading her cat poetry, exploring new hiking trails, or chasing waterfalls across Ontario.

 ADRIANA SCIOLI

Carleigh Baker, LAST WOMAN

Toronto: Penguin Random House Canada. $24.95

Last Woman by Carleigh Baker is a collection of short fiction that tears through the superficial crust of many of our world’s social constructions. In these stories, Baker delves into the effects of colonialism, our collective loss of humanity, the significance of companionship, the destruction of our planet, and the politics of social hierarchy, all of which she weaves into an overarching exploration of how people survive, and even thrive, in contemporary society.

There is a thoughtfulness in these stories that showcases Baker’s witty humour and careful social commentary equally; she uses fiction to closely compare and juxtapose real-world issues in a way that encourages readers to critically examine the influences on, and purposes of, her writing. Last Woman is layered with deep and thoughtful irony that calls on readers to re-evaluate their instinctual and habitual life choices by challenging the chronic discourse of superficial engagement to which we are increasingly conditioned through online and social media.

As a woman of nêhiyaw âpihtawikosisân/Icelandic culture, Baker writes from a culturally charged position, exploring the complexities of existing across a variety of—often conflicting—cultures and worlds. In the very first story, “Midwives,” two contemporary Indigenous women struggle to portage a canoe as readers gain insight to the narrator’s sense of cultural imposter syndrome: “We should be carrying the canoe over our heads but it’s too damn heavy. That’s what the guys do. That’s what the old-timey Voyageurs were doing in the artist renderings I googled before the trip. Convincing myself that I must have some kind of blood connection to the land, even though I come from the city.” It is the speaker’s cultural anxiety that fuels her fear that the internet knows more about how to portage a canoe than she does, and that growing up in the city instead of a reserve has perhaps dissolved a portion of her Indigenous identity. This first story sets the tone for a collection rife with insecurity, emotional sensitivity, and humour, populated by survivors, billionaires, loners, and empaths. Importantly, though, Baker’s prose consistently brings her various communities to the centre of her stories by supporting and validating them through her writing.

Picking up on the theme of insecurity, “Alphas” is a story about a young woman who experiences a night of anxious self-reflection and social awkwardness at her boyfriend’s DJ gig. Here, Baker skilfully writes about the systemic obsession of comparison culture in female relationships and the intensified internal misogyny that we see on social media platforms today. The story imposes the influx of thoughts that can over-take an insecure woman’s consciousness when she feels threatened by another woman, and it explores the unhealthy attitudes women can have toward other women as a result: “This alpha who just came in is so beautiful the light sharpens around her like an Instagram filter. She’s definitely in a band, maybe two bands, and she’s her hairdresser’s favourite client.” Baker’s writing embodies a very realistic thought process and defensiveness that can rise in women who don’t like to make room for other women in some communal spaces. In stories like this Baker’s fiction is able to confront the toxic impulses and tendencies that can structure our relationships. “Alphas” raises an important discussion about the assumptions that are made about women by women who consciously or unconsciously project feelings of self-hatred. In this way and others, this collection can get close to a reader’s deepest vulnerabilities and make them reflect on how their own complicity in and contribution to oppressive systems can continue to uphold the toxic structures of our world.

Baker has written this collection for our world’s worriers, survivors, and independent dreamers. Last Woman is a well-rounded work of fiction that is as insightful as it is entertaining. It takes strong writing, intelligence, and creativity to evoke and inspire critical thinking through fiction, and the range of stories in this collection allows readers to explore and create several connections to characters with whom they will relate whether they want to admit it or not. While it may feel exhausting to pick up a book that so convincingly reflects our own insecurities and highlights our world’s injustices, the wit and grace of the writing reminds us that it’s important to never stop reading, learning, and trying if we hope to make any changes to our world at all.


ADRIANA SCIOLI

(she/her) is in her fourth year of the Honours BA of Creative Writing & Publishing at Sheridan College; has a passion for writing essays, short stories, and op-eds; and has made her publication debut in The Familiars. She loves watching Hollywood classics such as 12 Angry Men, Funny Girl, and Singin’ in The Rain. In her spare time, you can find her sewing, reading in a café, thrifting, or listening to her favourite music while on a hike.

Sign up for our newsletter

* indicates required